No results found.
Your AI agents build fast but lack business context. Brief connects them to your decisions, customers, and constraints.
of business context lives in chats, meetings, and email threads across collaboration tools. Most of it is never captured in a system of record.
AI assistants fail more often when they lack context about past decisions, exceptions, and the reasoning behind them.
per week spent by teams searching across tools and docs trying to answer, "Why did we build it this way?"
Brief is infrastructure for your product context. It captures decisions and makes them accessible to AI agents.
Where you view your Product Graph, search decisions, and see customer insights.
Plugs your product context into Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and other AI assistants.
Connects to Linear, Jira, Notion, Slack, Fathom, GitHub, etc. to pull in decisions automatically.
Your team works in the tools you already use (Notion, Slack, etc.). Brief's integrations watch for product decisions and extract them automatically. Those decisions build your Product Graph in the web app.
When an engineer codes in Cursor or Claude Code, the MCP server lets their AI assistant query your Product Graph for context. The AI sees not just code, but why you built it that way.
Brief Product Graph Engine
Get enough input to build the right thing fast. Brief pulls in your ICP, Intent, and context from tools like Slack, Notion, and More. Accelerating product development.
Product Management Suite
Brief is a Strategy sounding board, Context Aggregator, and Self-Multiplier. Be in more places with less work.
Brief Model Context Protocol
Your engineers and coding agents access product judgment without back-and-forth. Our MCP surfaces strategy, decisions, and customer insights so Cursor, Claude, and Copilot pull the right context when making tradeoffs.
No. Brief isn't for tracking tasks. It reads your tickets and messages to find product decisions (like "we're using Stripe" or "we tried feature X and customers didn't use it"). Then when you're coding, you can ask your AI assistant about those decisions.
Docs tell you what features exist. Brief tells you WHY you built them that way. Like "we chose Stripe over building custom payments because we needed to ship fast" or "customers asked for SSO but we deprioritized it for now."
No. Keep working like you do now. Brief reads those tools automatically and extracts decisions.
Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, VS Code AI extensions. Basically any coding assistant that supports MCP (the protocol for connecting tools to AI).
As soon as you connect your tools. Brief starts reading your old tickets and docs immediately. Within a few minutes, you can ask your AI assistant questions like "why did we build auth this way?" and get actual answers.
For teams using Cursor/Claude/Copilot who need their AI to understand not just what the code does, but why it exists and what constraints it serves. Currently in beta with leading AI companies.